Paper Polly: Brought to you by the Bookaneer Review: Trash (by Andy Mulligan) (Post VI)

Style

 As we reach the end of Part Four of our mysterious mystery (almost), we find four newspaper articles that reveals more information about Senator Zapanta and the mystery behind 10 million dollars. Star Extra gives us a somewhat a neutral point of view. The preseident, in a way, feels with Senator Zapanta, stating that "this experience is not an easy one on her colleague." Furthermore, Star Extra is patiently waiting for more new outcomes to emerge.

 The Inquirer highlights facts that shed light on a somewhat harsher Zapanta, describing him as a man after his own agenda and not giving help and support to the orphans, especially after using their services.

 The Daily Star, in its turn, uses sarcasm and rhetorical questions to encourage us for an in-depth look into the reality of Senator Zapanta and to question the presence of 10 million dollars in cash hidden from the eyes of people who have paid their taxes for years and years. The Daily Star suggests that Senator Zapanta's 10 million dollars came either from the tax payers or the people's own income.

 Finally, the University Voice suggests that Senator Zapanta should step down from becoming a vice-president - and replace him with a leader that will work towards the benefit of the people and who will invest their time and money in Education and employment opportunities for all of the community; rich and poor.

 So how do newspaper articles paint more of an in-depth look into a story? It all starts with the headline. Usually, the headline gives us the readers an introduction into the matter of the article. And once you read the main article, you start feeding your brain more knowledge of what's happening in the story. You also get extra insight from different articles, such as rhetorical questions (i.e. "Could the rumors be true?" and "What was 10 million dollars doing in your house sir?").